{"id":20622,"date":"2025-09-29T11:15:51","date_gmt":"2025-09-29T11:15:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/?p=20622"},"modified":"2025-09-30T08:49:19","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T08:49:19","slug":"on-the-possibility-of-using-recycled-mixed-aggregates-and-gicc-thermal-plant-wastes-in-non-structural-concrete-elements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/on-the-possibility-of-using-recycled-mixed-aggregates-and-gicc-thermal-plant-wastes-in-non-structural-concrete-elements\/","title":{"rendered":"On the Possibility of Using Recycled Mixed Aggregates and GICC Thermal Plant Wastes in Non-Structural Concrete Elements"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-08faf45d50e2d2a18e1db0f86be42948 wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Authors<\/strong><br>Carlos Rodr\u00edguez; Isidro S\u00e1nchez*; Isabel Mi\u00f1ano; Francisco Benito; Marta Cabeza; Carlos Parra. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Abstract<\/strong><br>Laboratory concretes (\u224820 MPa target) were produced replacing 15\u201330% of natural aggregates with different recycled construction-and-demolition aggregates (RMA, ceramic, concrete) and with slag (coarse\/fine) from Gas Incinerator Combined Cycle (GICC) plants. Mechanical properties, capillary absorption, density, carbonation, chloride ingress, and sulfate resistance were assessed. Using C&amp;DW aggregates generally reduced performance versus the natural-aggregate control. In contrast, GICC by-products improved behaviour: the fine slag and fly ash used as cement additions enhanced long-term properties, and the coarse GICC slag used as recycled aggregate generally improved most properties. The study supports the feasibility of these wastes in <strong>non-structural<\/strong> concrete to promote circularity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Type of publication<\/strong><br>Journal paper. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2071-1050\/11\/3\/633\/pdf?version=1548419953\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">MDPI<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Publisher<\/strong><br><em>Sustainability<\/em> (MDPI), 11(3):633; Published 25 January 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>DOI<\/strong><br>10.3390\/su11030633. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-luminous-vivid-orange-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-e366f8cfdb9b3cb7064acf04f7475715 wp-block-paragraph\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2071-1050\/11\/3\/633\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ACCESS HERE<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Abstract<br \/>\nLaboratory concretes (\u224820 MPa target) were produced replacing 15\u201330% of natural aggregates with different recycled construction-and-demolition aggregates (RMA, ceramic, concrete) and with slag (coarse\/fine) from Gas Incinerator Combined Cycle (GICC) plants. Mechanical properties, capillary absorption, density, carbonation, chloride ingress, and sulfate resistance were assessed. Using C&#038;DW aggregates generally reduced performance versus the natural-aggregate control. In contrast, GICC by-products improved behaviour: the fine slag and fly ash used as cement additions enhanced long-term properties, and the coarse GICC slag used as recycled aggregate generally improved most properties. The study supports the feasibility of these wastes in non-structural concrete to promote circularity.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[156],"tags":[157],"class_list":["post-20622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publicaciones-cientificas","tag-publicaciones-cientificas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20622"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20682,"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20622\/revisions\/20682"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctcon-rm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}